Selection criteria

After I sent emails to the departments stating I have questions on the way, I made this selection criteria chart today:

Criteria	UCal.	UW	Job	Weight	Score
Professors-calibre/subject
Professors-social
Supportive research group
Research on topic of research group
Faculty/department socializing
Current financial support
Potential for increased financial support
Support for publishing/conferences
Support for finishing in 3 to 4
City-socializing/liveability
City-culture/adventure
Health
Predicted level of fulfillment

Are there any categories I might be missing? Any refinement to categories (such as Research on topic of research group category).

Visualizing Information for Advocacy by the Tactical Technology Collective

i'm totally psyched about browsing/reading this:
http://www.tacticaltech.org/infodesign

Modern life is saturated with ever increasing amounts of information, advertising and media with little time to digest what is being said. Against this background, NGOs and advocates too often find the information they want to communicate, either buried in long reports full of professional jargon and statistics, or overlooked in an endless stream of media releases. Whether communicating to the public, staff, donors or government officials, information design can help NGOs communicate with more impact, increase accessibility, and present issues powerfully.

Visualizing Information for Advocacy: An Introduction to Information Design is a manual aimed at helping NGOs and advocates strengthen their campaigns and projects through communicating vital information with greater impact. This project aims to raise awareness, introduce concepts, and promote good practice in information design – a powerful tool for advocacy, outreach, research, organization and education.

from what i can gather, Tactical Technology Collective is an international group, with members based (and funding received from organizations based) all over the world.